CDBG certified payroll in California
A construction contract paid for with Community Development Block Grant money almost always needs certified payroll in California, and often needs two separate filings at once. The federal rule runs through Section 110(a) of the Housing and Community Development Act, applied by 24 CFR 570.603: Davis-Bacon labor standards attach to CDBG financed construction, with one carve-out for the rehabilitation of residential property under 8 units. Because CDBG grants in California pass through a city, county, or urban county acting as the awarding body, the same job usually counts as a California public work too, under Labor Code 1720, which pulls in DIR's own filing regardless of that federal unit count.
What CDBG money actually triggers
The Community Development Block Grant program is HUD's annual grant to states, cities, counties, and urban counties for community development work: street and sidewalk repair, park and facility rehabilitation, water and sewer lines, and housing rehabilitation. You do not deal with HUD directly. You bid a contract the city or county writes, and that contract carries the federal labor clauses HUD requires it to pass down. If your bid documents list CDBG as the funding source, this page is about that job.
The federal side: Davis-Bacon and the 8 unit rule
Under 24 CFR 570.603(a), Section 110(a) of the Act (the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974) applies labor standards to nonvolunteer labor financed in whole or in part with CDBG assistance, and the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act applies alongside it. The regulation then narrows one case: those requirements reach the rehabilitation of residential property only if the property contains 8 or more units. A duplex or single-family home rehab funded with CDBG dollars sits outside federal Davis-Bacon coverage on that basis alone.
That carve-out is specific to residential rehabilitation. CDBG-funded work that is not residential rehab, a street resurfacing, a park restroom, a facade program, follows the ordinary Davis-Bacon rule instead: contracts over $2,000 for construction, alteration, or repair of public buildings or public works, per the U.S. Department of Labor. Most CDBG public improvement contracts clear that line on the estimate alone. The awarding body typically writes this in as Form HUD-4010, Federal Labor Standards Provisions, HUD's own clause for CDBG funded work. If that clause is in your contract, you owe a weekly WH-347, filed to the current DOL form, up your contracting chain.
California's eCPR: the layer HUD does not erase
Falling outside the federal 8 unit rule does not mean you are done. Labor Code 1720 defines a California public work as construction paid for in whole or in part out of public funds, and a federal grant running through a state or local awarding body still counts as public funds. A city awarding a CDBG-funded contract is a California awarding body, so the job typically owes DIR's electronic certified payroll record under Labor Code 1771.4, filed under your own DIR contractor registration, whether or not the 8 unit rule ever came into play on the federal side. A CDBG-funded triplex rehab that owes no WH-347 can still owe the eCPR in full.
California carries a narrower exemption of its own, sitting in Labor Code 1720(c)(5)(C), for assistance provided directly to a household for the rehabilitation of a single-family home, alongside separate exemptions in the same subdivision for self-help housing and nonprofit transitional shelter projects. That exemption fits a homeowner rehab grant program more than a competitively bid subcontract, and the conditions attached to it are specific. Do not assume it covers your contract. Ask the awarding body's labor compliance office, or check your own project against our guide on prevailing wage project thresholds, before treating a small CDBG job as exempt from either system.
Apprenticeship still runs on the California clock
A federally assisted project does not swap out California's apprenticeship paperwork. If the job is California public works, the usual DAS 140 and DAS 142 deadlines apply on top of whatever the federal wage determination requires for registered apprentices. Two systems, one worker, both forms.
HUD Section 3 is a different requirement, not a payroll filing
Section 3 gets confused with certified payroll because both show up in the same CDBG contract packet, but they answer different questions. Certified payroll proves you paid the right wage. Section 3, under 24 CFR 75.3, directs training, employment, and contracting opportunity to low income residents on a project where total HUD assistance exceeds $200,000. That threshold applies to the entire project, not your subcontract, so a large rehabilitation can trip Section 3 even when your own piece is small. The obligation lands on the recipient agency first, which flows reporting down through the contract, often as hours worked by Section 3 workers. That reporting sits alongside your WH-347 or eCPR. It does not replace either one.
What this looks like on your paperwork
- CDBG-funded street, park, or public facility work: WH-347 and eCPR, both, once the contract clears $2,000.
- CDBG-funded residential rehab, 8 or more units: WH-347 and eCPR, both.
- CDBG-funded residential rehab under 8 units, competitively bid by the agency: no WH-347, but the eCPR is still owed under Labor Code 1720 unless the narrow 1720(c)(5)(C) exemption actually fits your contract.
- Direct CDBG assistance to one homeowner, no public bid: confirm the 1720(c)(5)(C) exemption with the awarding body before assuming either filing is off the table.
- Total project assistance over $200,000: add Section 3 reporting to whichever of the above already applies.
The underlying payroll facts, hours, classifications, rates, and deductions, are the same regardless of which government is reading the report. We prepare both the WH-347 and the eCPR from one payroll export you send us, and a person reviews every filing before it goes out. First filing free.